User talk:Pagingmrherman

Hello and Welcome! I hope you like the place. --mav

Hi! I deleted your entry at Stompin' Tom Connors. Wikipedia can't tolerate copyright violations, even when you give the original source credit. If you want to write an original article, please do so. -- Zoe

Aww man, copyrights suck!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pagingmrherman (talk • contribs) 2003-02-02 06:59:33 (UTC)

I understand that you feel Myers-Briggs Type Indicators are the greatest thing since sliced bread, but please do not add personality types to biography article headers (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style). I noticed that you did it in the case of Linus Torvalds, if you did it in other cases, please clean it up. If you want to keep them in, do the following:

Get a reference for each type classification -- who has classified this person and where was this classification published?
Move the classification - with that reference - to a "Personality" section at the bottom or something similar. "XY has classified AB as foo in the Myers-Briggs personality type classification scheme based on ..."

I'd prefer to have this limited to the respective articles, though (e.g. ISTP), but also with references. --Eloquence

Your recent article on The Turbans was seriously in error and several of the other articles you put in today are extremely short and non-encyclopedic. Perhaps you need to do a little more research before committing to writing an article and also read up on the idea of NPOV, the neutral point of view. Ortolan88

I just removed your content for Linux zealot. It did not explain what a linux zealot is, even remotely. matt 06:25 Feb 5, 2003 (UTC)

You need to understand that this is a serious endevour to produce an encyclopedia. I have had to alter or delete several of your entries. --rmhermen

Yes I agree. --mav

that's ok I like doing stubs sometimes they get through sometimes they don't. At least some people fix them up. I'd rather throw something in there and let someone else do the cleanup —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pagingmrherman (talk • contribs) 2003-05-06 04:58:06 (UTC)

Clean-up is a lot of work. Most people would rather work on their own entries than clean up other people's messes. --mav

ya but there are a *few* people that prefer to clean up rather than start anything new. Some of the largest trees can grow from a pile of shit!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pagingmrherman (talk • contribs) 2003-05-06 05:04:04 (UTC)

Please, In this case if you want trees it's better to plant seeds than spread shit. Perhaps a better metaphor is that much of what you've planeted has been noxious weeds, and you're imposing on others to check what you planted in any given place. Please don't put in random guesses or stuff you just make up. Usefull link: http://www.google.com Spend a little time looking something up, and you can probably find some good information to start or add to an article. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 05:18 May 6, 2003 (UTC)

DVD

I noticed you posted a new article titled "Dvd". You may not be aware that there's already another article titled "DVD". —Vespristiano 01:25, 2004 Feb 20 (UTC)

woops, I didn't see that (I thought it was a glaring omission) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pagingmrherman (talk • contribs) 2003-05-06 05:04:04 (UTC)

I notice you are still having problems knowing how to format your articles. Some usefull links for you to take a look at:

Hope this helps! -- Infrogmation 05:26, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Admin Nomination

Hello, I would appreciate your help by earning your vote as an admin. I have been here about 5 months now and have been nominated. I have made many contributions and have improved on my editing and behavior. I take this seriously, that is why I have gotten into it with Anthony so much. You can look at my user page yourself and see my contribtions. I would appreciate a vote in the yes column if you agree. Again, thanks for your time and help. ChrisDJackson 02:34, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I saw the Breadbox article you recently created. While I applaud your efforts to improve Wikipedia, if you are making entries this short, you should really mark them with as stubs (or in this case, substubs). In any case, this article seems to be mainly a definition of "breadbox", so I am nominating it to be moved to Wiktionary. If you have more to add to it, go ahead, and remove the Wiktionary notice. Next time, if you want to add something like this, please do it directly to Wiktionary. — [[User:Knowledge Seeker|Knowledge Seeker দ (talk)]] 19:16, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Image licencing

Hi, you contributed these images Image:Vgapinout.JPG and Image:Vgapinout0.JPG. Could you please add copy right infomation to the image pages see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for more details. Thanks --nixie 08:49, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:Plane4.gif has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Plane4.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Your edit on Wikipedia

Your edit describing a list of top editors on Wikipedia was inappropriate. Entries to the encyclopedia articles should not be made in the first person, and also should not describe comments like "I sure as hell can't find it." Please read the Manual of Style for contributing to the Wikipedia. Thank you. Bratsche^{talk | Esperanza} 03:18, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Production work

Your article Production work has been nominated for deletion, if you wish to comment please do so here. Eivind 01:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Jobs

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do. -- Gnetwerker 02:06, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

– Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:42, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Parks in the city of Windsor, Ontario

The parks and recreation lists the distance from the Bridge to Hiram Walker on its bike trail, every few hundred meters, with decimals, such as 1.1, 2.0, 3.5, meaning the distance from the bridge, or distance to it. Even the Ganatchio Trail has "20.7" and 20.3" on it near Sandpoint Park. Riverfront Trail has "5.8." at its present eastern end, the junction with Lincoln Avenue, Riverside Drive, and the bike lanes.

User:Raccoon Fox • Talk 20:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, maybe it is, I used the 'measure distance' thing in MS Mappoint and it came out to 5km and I thought I read it in the Windsor Star before.

Image tagging for Image:DVI_Connector.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DVI_Connector.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to edit responsibly

Here's an edit where I did a bit of cleanup to one of your stubs. I really think you should be able to take care of such things yourself by now. You've been here a good while, but you keep making newbie type edits. Please review the above links or ask for help if you don't understand how to do things. -- Infrogmation 13:21, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube

Hi, as I mentioned on the discussion page, youtube currently does not use vp6, and the player swf is version 7. You can confirm this by grabbing the player swf file and any flv from browser cache after visiting youtube, then there are tools that will tell you the versions. So, could you fix the article please as it is incorrect?

Roof Rack

Hi there, I moved your Roof Rack article to Roof rack; no difference, except the removal of capitals on the second word (because it wasn't a name). All the best Fourohfour 15:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DNS Service Discovery

DNS Service Discovery has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Scout Association of the Cayman Islands

Do you have evidence that camping is illegal in the Cayman Islands? I find it surprising, so if you can not source it I suggest your edit should be reverted. --Bduke 02:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candy

Can you give a source as to why you are claiming sour things aren't candies? 170.232.128.10 19:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  I added sour candies to candy and someone took it out.  So I guess they've decided sour "candy" isn't candy.

Don't let them get away with that without making them find a source for you! AFAIK being sour doesn't disqualify sour sweets like skittles from being candy.Zebulin 23:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

war of 1812 article

Thanks for replacing erroneous war of 1812 casualties figure with sourced accurate numbers. I knew 16,000 war dead was much too high.Zebulin 23:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Camelot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Camelot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Leading Man

A tag has been placed on Leading Man requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Graham Wilson (spiritual advisor)

A tag has been placed on Graham Wilson (spiritual advisor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John Anderson (drunkard)

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rnb (talk) 03:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympic stamps.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Olympic stamps.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 19:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of GNU Oleo

I have nominated GNU Oleo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNU Oleo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Molson Stock Ale

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Molson Stock Ale, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Holy shit that was fast - there must be robots patrolling wikipedia nowadays. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pagingmrherman (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fsarchiver

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Fsarchiver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Hasteur (talk) 18:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muxlab

A tag has been placed on Muxlab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Killian441 (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brainwave Music Project

Hello Pagingmrherman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Brainwave Music Project for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tina Gasturich (talk) 21:23, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ZTE Open C

The article ZTE Open C has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of why this one model is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 19:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kiosk (software)

The article Kiosk (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Contextual Electronics

Hello Pagingmrherman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Contextual Electronics for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ZTE Open C

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on ZTE Open C requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Supply Frame

Hello Pagingmrherman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Supply Frame for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STOP. I have reverted inappropriate changes you made to six articles you edited in the last 40 minutes. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JEEEEZ TAKE A CHILL PILL OK MAN WIKIPEDIA IS SO NAZI NOW COMPARED OT 2005 (ER. 2003)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pagingmrherman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, jeez guys I won't do it again. I got drunk and bored. For godsakes I *started* the page on Burt Reynolds.

Decline reason:

Not a very convincing unblock statement. only (talk) 11:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pagingmrherman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pagingmrherman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xdmx

The article Xdmx has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very obsolete (2004) fringe software that was never notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 15:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keyboards listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Keyboards. Since you had some involvement with the Keyboards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:49, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bulk bins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulk bins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulk bins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 16:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ORBit

The article ORBit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG for not including any references to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mika1h (talk) 00:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]