User talk:Ranma9617

Hello Ranma9617 and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Seiyuu

Just a quick heads up on a bunch of recent edits I made to the individual seiyuu articles, a lot of which were started by you. I recently changed most of them in order for them to appear in Category:Seiyuu in alphabetical order by family name. For maintaining that order, it might be a good idea to put the sort key directly into any new articles you create in the future. For example [[Category:Seiyuu|Nakahara Mai]] (don't worry about that specific article, though; I already took care of it). Thanks! --MarkSweep 20:28, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Category:Seiyu

Thanks for all your help in moving the seiyū articles from the old category. I just started editing again, and there were only a few articles left to move! Josh 04:02, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

Tamao Hayashi

I was just looking at this article and trying to decide whether it met the speedy deletion critera when you removed the speedy notice. You should not have removed the notice as you were the author of the article. I will leave the notice off as I think it just barely fails to qualify as a candidate for speedy delete. You could improve the artice, by for example mentioning that this artist was a voice on Crayon Shin-chan. I can't add this as easily as I'm not sure what sex they are, so I don't know whether to use he or she.-gadfium 02:18, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

InuYasha Manga Chapters

Yo:

i would appreciate it if you can tell me where you found the information on the current chapter of InuYasha released through manga. Through a website? or you subscribe to the manga in Japanese? ( !!! ) lol

Thanks. LG-犬夜叉 08:27, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the link...very useful. But wouldn't it be illegal to put such a detailed description of what happens in the manga on the Internet? lol but it's nevertheless good for the fans outside of Japan. Cheers~ LG-犬夜叉 03:57, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

seiyu stubs

good work on the seiyu; quick question: is the actor-stub template appropriate to seiyu? more appropriate than the bio-stub?Nateji77 12:57, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Tessaiga

Hi. I have posted a request to revisit this topic at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Japan-related_articles). Thanks. Your input will be appreciated. LG-犬夜叉 09:35, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)

Using macrons

I noticed you were having a frustrating time on the Kappei Yamaguchi page. Have you used the box that appears below the "Save page", "Show preview", and "Show changes" buttons? It's full of the most common macronned characters. All you have to do to use them is place your cursor in the edit box where you wish the macronned character to appear, and then click on the appropriate macronned character. Hope that helps. (^_^) --日本穣 07:16, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox Public Transit

According to Wikipedia:The German solution, here’s a a tip for you: {{User:Olve/Userboxes/Public transport}} (in lieu of the blanked template:User Public Transit). -- Olve 22:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re:Puyo Pop Fever 2

You might not have detected it, but edits made by User:24.205.31.88(blocked numerous times for introducing incorrect info to articles) directly before your minor edit was vandailistic nonsense which I since reverted...Ranma9617 01:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My bot is not a vandalism bot. It only updates cleanup tags. It did that...quite well. I'm not really sure what you think I should do. Alphachimpbot 01:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Witham

If your investigations have yielded any concrete evidence, I would be very pleased to hear it, as so far all I have heard are unsubstantiated allegations. Tyrenius 04:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of postal codes in Mexico

Hi Just wanted to say that you are doing excellent work to this article and making it much more useable. Keep it up! Eddie.willers 11:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Yamaguchi_Kappei.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yamaguchi_Kappei.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Steely Dan

I know this could be considered spamming, but I couldn't help noticing that you have a Steely Dan userbox. I am trying to start a Steely Dan WikiProject and was just wondering if you were interested. Come to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Steely_Dan to sign up and visit the WikiProject-to-be's temporary page here. NauticaShad e s 16:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Save the List!

They are trying to delete the lists we've work so hard on help put a stop to it. List of J-pop Artists Vote to keep our precious list!!! -Bilaber 21:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHDH

Thanks for catching that vandalism on the WHDH page. That user has done this before on numerous pages and under 4 IP addresses that I know of....68.162.247.229, 141.154.10.193, 68.160.165.46, and 68.162.243.40, all these IPs are out of Verizon of Boston. I appericate your help and ask you to keep an eye on the Boston stations, among others, as those are the ones he/she hits the most. Thanks again....SVRTVDude ^{(Yell - Toil)} 18:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up on the new IP address. I have that one on my watchlist too. I wonder if we should let Verizon know as well, since they could track down the account via the IP address and could shut them down that way. Just a thought there. I will keep an eye on the new IP. Thanks again:) - SVRTVDude ^{(Yell - Toil)} 07:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I added some comments to the page...I hope they help. I will keep that on my watchlist and keep an eye on all the TV pages for any retaliation (sp) for it. - SVRTVDude ^{(Yell - Toil)} 08:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mervyn's

Thanks for catching that Sunrise Mall ambiguity. TenPoundHammer 16:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing prods

Please give a proper explanation in the edit summary when removing proposed deletion notices from articles. Merely stating a prod is "dubious", as you did with Fahad Kazi, is totally insufficient. In future please give full reasons, with reference to deletion policy whenever possible. Thank you. Qwghlm 11:38, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kappei Yamaguchi

If you'd have looked at the talk page, you'll see it's added there, where most of the maintenance templates belong - and I'd say that most image request templates as a subcategory of maintenance templates fall into this category (the blatant exception being the "blank" that show up in album & song infoboxes).

As it stands, the entire top of the article is simply one huge template, no text for c. 15 lines - not really a desirable thing for someone coming to look for information on the subject to see first and foremost, right? I've gone through over 3500 articles so far in the 'requested photos' (actually searching for mis-tagged film articles) and only about 5 of these image maintenance tags were placed on the article and not the talk page - all have been removed and put on the talk page. 02:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

KOMO TV article - recent edits, etc

In a recent edit you made to the KOMO-TV article, you mention that it "conveniently" forgets how KOMO has done ratings-wise both historically and currently.

Well, it's not a matter of "conveniently forgetting" as you put it. It's a matter of there being no real web-based source of information to go from in terms of citing.

I can certainly say without a shadow of a doubt, however, that for most of the 1980s leading into the very late 1990s, KOMO was the leader in TV news for the Seattle market. I can also add with certainty that while KING 5 News consistently ran "Number One at 5 o'clock..." voiceover tags during their news intros in that same time frame, it was infact KOMO that led the ratings race (predominantly due to the fact that during much of the 1980s and 1990s, ABC News was the most-watched network news organization, and both ABC News and KOMO News tied together hand-in-hand ratings-wise for the Seattle market).

It's also worthy to note that in 1996, KOMO held the top spot nationally for "Best Newscast" and infact won that title six out of eight years in a row. Also, in 1995 and 1996, KOMO won 18 emmy awards, including the top six, and consistently beats KING in annual emmy award counts.

I'm not here to start a flame war with anybody nor an edit war, but I've noticed a considerable amount of bias against KOMO on Wikipedia. Srosenow 98 09:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newscast Schedules Goof-Up

Thanks for the correction. I got into a groove and didn't realize I had made a mistake or two. Am trying to track those down now and correct them. Thanks for your help. Take Care....NeutralHomer ^T:C 11:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject U2 invitation

You have been invited to join WikiProject U2, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the U2-related articles on Wikipedia. You recieved this invitation due to your interest in U2 and/or your many edits to U2 articles. If you would like to join, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members.

Thank you, Dream out loud (talk)

Rootology

Howdy,

You may not be aware, but JWales actually granted Rootology's m:Right to vanish request. Also, we're unlikely to forget his history, so leaving that page tagged is unnecessary and it can be restored in seconds if Rootology begins acting abusively again. In the meantime, I suggest that you re-delete it. I'll defer from doing so myself unless I don't hear back from you in a reasonable amount of time. Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 18:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he has not edited in a long time, and doesn't seem to be doing anything on Wikipedia at this time, so I don't understand what purpose this serves. Let me know if I am wrong.--Jimbo Wales 18:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rootology now runs www.wikiabuse.com which catalogues abuses of Wikipedia Administrators. Askedaxiss 01:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ranma9617, it's been almost a day, so I'm going to go ahead and re-delete User:Rootology per the above. Please contact me if you have any concerns. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POINT/WP:IDONTLIKEIT

I respectfully disagree with your interpretations of WP:POINT and WP:IDONTLIKEIT. They are referring to arguments made when discussing the deletion of articles, not when tagging articles for cleanup, as I did. Tagging articles for cleanup is neither disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, nor is it an expression of opinion on the subject. I added the {{notability}} and {{unreferenced}} notices to the various television news music articles because (1) none of the articles explained why their subjects were important, and (2) none of the articles' statements were sourced.

This isn't meant to be a criticism of you; just an explanation of how I interpreted Wikipedia guidelines. Assuming good faith, and all that. :) —tregoweth (talk) 23:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Megumi1.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Megumi1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 10:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh My Goddess!

A goddess descends to your talk page

Hi, I noticed your username appears on this category and would like to invite you to take part in a general improvement drive on all articles relevant to Oh My Goddess! including character articles, episode articles and others. -- Cat ^chi? 21:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I apologize

Between December 14, 2005 and June 7, 2007, I vandalized Wikipedia under my previous username (YechielMan) and under various IP addresses and alternate accounts.

I recently reviewed the contribution logs of all the accounts and IP addresses that I can recall having used. My goal was to identify all of the intentionally harmful edits I caused, and to apologize to the individual users who reverted those edits, or warned me, or blocked me.

Hence, I apologize to you and to all of the following users:

Adam Bishop, Amarkov, Antandrus, AntiVandalBot, Bdj (Badlydrawnjeff), Conk 9, CanbekEsen, DLand, Downwards, Eagle 101, Ericbronder, Gogo Dodo, High on a tree, Hut 8.5, Interiot, Jayjg, Jrwallac, Kingboyk, Kuru, Noclip, Patrick Berry, PFHLai, PhantomS, Pollinator, Rachack, Ranma9617, Rx StrangeLove, SlimVirgin, Tfrogner, TommyBoy, Vary, Woohookitty, Zzuuzz, and some anonymous IPs. (I also reverted one edit myself after it went unnoticed for three weeks.)

Thank you for maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia against everyone who has attacked it, including my old self.

If you wish to respond, please do so at my talk page.

Best regards, Shalom (Hello • Peace) 19:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sacramento Regional Transit District

Hi, I noticed your contributions to Sacramento Regional Transit District. The Light rail in North America has a section dedicated to Sacramento's light rail system but it is not written. What's needed is a 1-2 paragraph summary of the whole light rail system if you'd like to write it. Cheers.--Loodog (talk) 00:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Daisuke Kishio

A tag has been placed on Daisuke Kishio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 08:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ryūzō Ishino

A tag has been placed on Ryūzō Ishino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 01:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ryūzō Ishino

I have nominated Ryūzō Ishino, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryūzō Ishino. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Collectonian (talk) 16:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith...

Was this edit summary really necessary? My only editing in this area is creating articles on sumo wrestlers and the prefecture category is nearly always the correct one, as the majority of rikishi come from the countryside rather than cities. It's not that I "don't give a damn" about the Japanese people by city categories, it's just for me, they're usually not applicable so I'm not aware of them. I'll watch out for them in the future.Pawnkingthree (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People by Japanese cities, areas

Yeah, I was surprised to see that s it s gone this long where just the very largest cities in Japan have People from cat pages. I m a bit side-tracked now but hope to get back to helping out on expanding this area. Best regards Mayumashu (talk) 12:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed?

Question about this edit: What was malformed about the ANN template as it was? According to the template documentation, since the updates a couple months ago, {{ann|type=person}} is perfectly valid use (as would be {{ann|person}}, though I admit I don't entirely trust the syntax parser to get that right). —Quasirandom (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. When I added the link, it worked. Wonder if the template syntax had gotten monkeyed with. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Goddess Family Club

A tag has been placed on Goddess Family Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 08:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject San Francisco 49ers

Hello fellow Wikipedian! I just wanted to let you know that WikiProject San Francisco 49ers is looking for participants who are interested in improving the quality of the articles on the San Francisco 49ers! If you want to help, you can add your name to our list of participants, check out our to-do list, and most importantly, improve the articles!

--pbroks13^talk? 23:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

I notice some of your templates on your user page, and I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever to Wikipedia, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rite Aid

Hi Ranma9617. I'd like to get that big box removed from the Labor Violations section. Would it help if I add a few notes about what the company says in response to the union's charges? Thanks for your interest and assistance. BTW, I left a message for you on the Rite Aid talk page as well. Which place is preferable? I'm still learning my way around here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiGolightly (talk • contribs) 09:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huey Lewis and the News

Yay! I am VERY happy to see other people using the userbox I created. Thank you Fore! adding it to your page! ;) CarpetCrawler^{message me} 21:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tsuru hi.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tsuru hi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Check_Game is currently up for deletion, along with this and 94 other Price is Right games

You are welcome to comment in this deletion discussion. You are being contacted because you participated in the first AFD in 2007. Ikip (talk) 21:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tōru Sakai

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tōru Sakai, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tōru Sakai. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andyzweb (talk) 11:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ranma9617! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 14 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Hideyuki Tanaka - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tomo Sakurai - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Takashi Nagasako - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mariko Kōda - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jin Yamanoi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jōji Nakata - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Chikao Ōtsuka - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Takahiro Sakurai - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ayako Shiraishi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Kaoru Fujino - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Yūto Kazama 12. Akiko Kimura 13. Atsuko Takahata 14. Michiko Nomura

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chieko Higuchi

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chieko Higuchi. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chieko Higuchi. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup

You added a cleanup tag to Hard Rock Cafe in December 2008, where it continues to languish. Could you check the article and see if any more cleanup is needed? Thanks, Griffinofwales (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Volleyball players

I have seen that you edited some volleyball articles. Some players articles, most of them looks outdated. I would like to improve players by country. Could you please choose a country to contribute with? Please take a look on Yekaterina Gamova, Hélia Souza, Serena Ortolani and Kenia Carcaces for a model to follow. Please can you please improve some volleyball players with infobox and some addons? References are very important. Let me know. Oscar987 22:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Yuriko Miyamoto

Hi, I notice you put a contradict flag on Yuriko Miyamoto in August 2008 regarding "bad faith edits that cannot be undone". I've read through the article, and I couldn't see any obvious contradictions, so I've removed the tag. If you feel this is inappropriate, please feel free to put it back, and a note on the talk page explaining where the contradiction is. Cheers -- WORM MЯOW 11:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miyoko Asō

The article Miyoko Asō has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for sources reveals an insufficient amount of reliable coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for people.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 15:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reiko Ōmori for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reiko Ōmori is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reiko Ōmori until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoshuSasori (talk) 23:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michiaki Furuya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michiaki Furuya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michiaki Furuya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 18:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamao Hayashi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamao Hayashi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamao Hayashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ranma9617. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ranma9617. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yayoi Jinguji

The article Yayoi Jinguji has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:24, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ranma9617. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inuko Inuyama

Hello, Ranma9617. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inuko Inuyama".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 07:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ranma9617. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ken Production

The article Ken Production has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:33, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan. Qwerfjkl talk 16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § X by Y in Z

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § X by Y in Z on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 11:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]