Jump to content

Talk:Gene Kelly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alleged IRA contributions

[edit]

I've removed the sentence alleging Kelly's supposed contributions, credited to a Scottish newspaper and a "free library." WP:V covers this by requiring that "Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources." Clearly that requirement is not met. Coretheapple (talk) 14:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this was a good removal. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kelly's nephew admitted Gene he did give money to the IRA in the 1970s. (2A00:23C4:6392:3C00:C8FF:D503:BC1:2737 (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]
If you can produce multiple high-quality reliable sources for that extraordinary claim, that he gave money to a terrorist group, please cite. Otherwise do not add it to the article. Coretheapple (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What is extraordinary about it? Many Americans funded the Provisional IRA during the 1970s and 1980s, especially in New York and Boston. There are multiple sources online for Kelly's support for the IRA's bombing campaign. (2A00:23C4:6392:3C00:C8FF:D503:BC1:2737 (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]
No, there is one source. You posted two links to the same source, Daily Record (Scotland), a Scottish tabloid. WP:V requires multiple sourcing for a claim such as this. One tabloid won't suffice. WP:EXCEPTIONAL takes you to the section of that policy covering situations such as this. Coretheapple (talk) 12:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SUBJECTIVE Violation?

[edit]

The phrase "probably the most popular and admired of all film musicals" seems like a violation of WP:SUBJECTIVE to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:a601:651:4401:2d0b:a23e:8b06:c6c7 (talkcontribs) 06:50, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lifelong Democrat

[edit]

Gene Kelly was part of the leadership of the PCA political party. Currently there's a sentence in this entry that states "Kelly was a lifelong supporter of the Democratic Party." Is there a way to mark that statement as needing a citation? Dragonarras (talk) 02:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 April 2021 and 21 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Luchk7. Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RfC about description in opening of article and infobox

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Closing remarks: There is clear community consensus that B is the more correct lead sentence. I have also found the users in support of B have stronger arguments. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 16:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Kelly was a multitalented performer, but there is some dispute as to how he should be referred to in the opening of the article. I believe the choices are these:

  • A "actor, dancer, singer, filmmaker, and choreographer." This is the current formulation,
  • B "dancer, actor, singer, filmmaker and choreographer."

The dispute is basically over whether to put "actor" or "dancer" first. I don't believe the order of the other two is at issue. Coretheapple (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
  • I think B is mandated by MOS:FIRST, as the first sentence summarizes the article, and dance (not acting) was his primary legacy. While he did perform in non-dancing roles, they were secondary to his roles in which he danced. (Indeed, as noted in the article, later in his career is television appearance focused on dance, and he even choreographed a ballet) That is also the consensus of reliable sources, which is apparent if one reviews the obituaries at the time of his death:
  • New York Times: Headline "Gene Kelly, Dancer of Vigor and Grace, Dies." : "Gene Kelly, the dancer, actor, director and choreographer who brought a vigorous athleticism, casual grace and an earthy masculinity..." [1]
  • Los Angeles Times : "Gene Kelly Dies; Legendary Dancer Was 83": "Gene Kelly, the exuberant, charismatic hoofer who danced, sang, smiled and splashed his way into the hearts of generations, died Friday..."[2]
  • "Washington Post: "SONG-AND-DANCE MAN GENE KELLY DIES": "Gene Kelly, 83, the dancer whose joyful, brawny and exuberant choreography spoke of ballet and the athletic field yet made him seem like Everyman, died yesterday." Note that this article doesn't even describe him as an actor until far down. [3]
  • Here's an appreciation of his life as a "dance icon" by a Knight Ridder columnist, with a side piece describing him as a "dancer's dancer," in the Orange County Register. [4]
  • Here's a column at his death by the Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Paul Greenberg, celebrating Kelly as "The Other Half of American Dance." [5]
  • Likewise, the Associated Press emphasized Kelly as a dancer in its lavish coverage of his death. "He was charming, self-made and witty. But more than anything, the man could dance." [6]

--Coretheapple (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Status quo Kelly was indeed a talented dancer and singer, but he's most famous for being an actor. He was nominated for a best actor Academy Award and he's acted in many famous films. Nemov (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The same can be said of Fred Astaire, who is the movie star most closely associated with Kelly, and he is listed in his Wikipedia article as a "an American dancer, choreographer, actor, and singer" He received more acting honors than Kelly. Coretheapple (talk) 16:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Not really convinced per WP:OTHERSTUFF, but actor was listed first there as recently as last July before an IP edit.[7]. Nemov (talk) 19:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure why anyone would say that Kelly is "most famous for being an actor". Take a look at the links provided by Coretheapple, or any obituary or profile or encyclopedia article or reference article on him. He is by far best known for his dancing and the innovations he brought to dance. The same goes for Frank Sinatra, who, although he starred in a number of films including strictly non-musical roles, and won an Oscar for a non-singing role, is by far best known as a singer. Softlavender (talk) 06:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This isn't complicated. If you asked most people what they remember about Sinatra they would mention a song he sang. If you asked most people what they remember about Gene Kelly, they would mention a movie for which he was the star. Nemov (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Well I disagree with you but the process that we employ is not, as you say, complicated. When we differ on phraseology we defer to the reliable sources. We don't substitute our thoughts, feelings and impressions with those of reliable sources. In this case it's a fairly easy process, considering the emphasis in the obits and posthumous books such as Gene Kelly: A Life of Dance and Dreams. Figureofnine (talkcontribs) 13:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(1) That's not true, it's just your ill-informed personal opinion. (2) That's not how Wikipedia works, which is based on coverage in reliable sources. Softlavender (talk) 22:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • A I would say he is most famous for dancing in movies. That being said, who cares? Random person no 362478479 (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    BI think the actors should be lined up before the dancers. Even though dance may be his favorite for him, the deepest impression of him is still the actor. He has achieved achievements at the Oscars, creating the image of a strong actor. Winning an Oscar was enough to put his identity as an actor above that of a dancer. Of course, another reason is that in the eyes of the public, there is no award in the dance world that can be compared with the Oscars, and the Oscar is his greatest achievement in the art world in the eyes of the public.악준동 (talk) 07:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would also say AMisty Copeland would be an example of someone who would qualify as "B", IMO. --IJBall (contribstalk) 16:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • B. First and foremost a dancer, and that is what he is known for. Softlavender (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    He's probably most famously known for "singing in the rain" in a film called Singing in the Rain. Nemov (talk) 14:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes of course. But what set him apart from the hundreds of thousands of other film actors were his innovations in dance, his "every man" style, etc., which was a subject of enormous attention during his life and afterwards. He appeared in nondancing roles, just as Sinatra appeared in nonsinging roles, notably Maggio in From Here to Eternity. But again, if we differ over how to phrase the Sinatra article, we just glance at the sources. Wikipedia editors don't substitute their judgment for the judgment of sources. Figureofnine (talkcontribs) 13:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • C: actor, choreographer, dancer, filmmaker, and singer. When there's a dispute where there's no clear and obvious primary category, just list the alphabetically, as it's objective. oknazevad (talk) 13:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • B. When most people think of Gene Kelly, they think, "a famous dancer who did lots of films". -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • B. Per the sources and the arguments above. - SchroCat (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • B I think the issue here is the dissonance between what he is primarily notable for (dance) and what he was most famous for (the movies). He is intrinsically defined as dancer—his movie career was an extension of that—even though he is probably best known to a modern audience through his film work. Betty Logan (talk) 21:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I agree, and that is why the sources referred to him as they did. Contrast with Michael Callan, who was a dancer (the original Riff in West Side Story) but ultimately found work almost exclusively as an actor in comedy and dramatic roles. In making these assessments of course we must use the judgment of reliable secondary sources and not our own perceptions of whether his appearing in films means he was an actor first and foremost. Coretheapple (talk) 14:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • B Even on film he was very much the dancer. This is what he is known for. ---Lilach5 (לילך5) discuss 20:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • A Changing the order of the series, while maintaining the same components of the series, won't improve the quality of the lede.Writethisway (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • A I think he was an actor first and foremost because being an actor made him famous. And won the Academy Award for Lifetime Achievement and the Golden Bear Award at the Berlin International Film Festival. Both awards are given to actors. So I think the identity of an actor seems to be more important to him.And his own final choice is to focus more on acting. So I think the identity of an actor should be put in the first place.Hhhh2 (talk) 06:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.